You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems std::variant (or boost::variant) is better suited to our needs. It is safer and more efficient, given that all possible types are known. Additional services like std::visit would also be welcome to clean the current macro-based implementation.
The probable future update to C++17 would be the best opportunity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems
std::variant
(orboost::variant
) is better suited to our needs. It is safer and more efficient, given that all possible types are known. Additional services likestd::visit
would also be welcome to clean the current macro-based implementation.The probable future update to C++17 would be the best opportunity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: