You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all - I am excited about this app. This is simply great!
But handling could be better:
In Overview Apps you see number of apps, number of blocked, isolated, ...excluded apps.
It would be extremely helpful if pushing to that numbers opens just these apps (instead of a list of all).
Also: Seeing a number of apps in a filtered list (example Installed/Games). If you select a single app (to change its behavior) and you do a return - the filter is not active anymore. So you have to set the filter again and again. Just keep it.
Third:
If you have a list of apps it would be very useful to select a few (by checkbox) of them to be handled in one step. Right now you have to change Firewall rules (not metered, metered, isolated ...) for each single app and than return to the big list (with the problems listed above).
Thanks for your attention. I would be glad to get a little feedback.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
First of all - I am excited about this app. This is simply great!
But handling could be better:
In Overview Apps you see number of apps, number of blocked, isolated, ...excluded apps.
It would be extremely helpful if pushing to that numbers opens just these apps (instead of a list of all).
Also: Seeing a number of apps in a filtered list (example Installed/Games). If you select a single app (to change its behavior) and you do a return - the filter is not active anymore. So you have to set the filter again and again. Just keep it.
Third:
If you have a list of apps it would be very useful to select a few (by checkbox) of them to be handled in one step. Right now you have to change Firewall rules (not metered, metered, isolated ...) for each single app and than return to the big list (with the problems listed above).
Thanks for your attention. I would be glad to get a little feedback.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: