-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Focusing quality improvements #2
Comments
The TDS01 ERS1 example dataset has range size 5000 for current development version, but baseline has 4991, hence a 5 pixel padding exclusion. |
TDS09 has 5128 vs 5141, hence a 6/7 padding. |
Focussing quality should also improve for the areas not in the middle of picture (maybe need to modify usage of Vr as well). Echo metadata might need to be propagated as well, because the parser does not know |
There is something interesting happening regarding SWST for ERS here - https://github.com/gmtsar/gmtsar/blob/master/preproc/ERS_preproc/ers_line_fixer/ers_line_fixer.c#L434 |
One option would be to simply pad left and right for the range as it is done here - https://github.com/isce-framework/isce2/blob/main/components/isceobj/Sensor/ERS_EnviSAT.py#L557 This would be instead of cutting range. |
Investigate sar_metadata.h CalcKa() and CalcAperturePixels(). Further on investigate L1 datasets which L0 has not a long sensing time -> therefore try to find how much was cut by the reference processor (because it cannot include more pixels in the beginning and in the end and then should publish less data than requested by the sensing end and start?!). Try to correlate these findings with CalcAperturePixels() |
Results windowing is implemented with this pull request - #33 |
Range compression windowing is implemented by this PR - #34 |
Range/Azimuth compression windowingThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: