Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

available simulations for CORDEX-CMIP5 #26

Open
JavierDiezSierra opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

available simulations for CORDEX-CMIP5 #26

JavierDiezSierra opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@JavierDiezSierra
Copy link
Collaborator

@larsbuntemeyer @jesusff

The script for downloading CMIP5-CORDEX-EUR-11 data for the evaluation experiment, including the variables ['tas', 'tasmin', 'tasmax', 'pr', 'psl', 'orog', 'sftlf'], is ready.

Before starting the download, I have checked the availability of both RCMs and variables.

Here is the list of available RCMs:

'CLMcom-ETH.COSMO-crCLIM-v1-1.v1'
'CLMcom.CCLM4-8-17.v1'
'CNRM.ALADIN53.v1'
'CNRM.ALADIN63.v1'
'DHMZ.RegCM4-2.v1'
'DMI.HIRHAM5.v1'
'GERICS.REMO2015.v1'
'ICTP.RegCM4-6.v1'
'IPSL.WRF381P.v1'
'KNMI.RACMO22E.v1'
'MOHC.HadREM3-GA7-05.v1'
'MPI-CSC.REMO2009.v1'
'RMIB-UGent.ALARO-0.v1'
'SMHI.RCA4.v1'

Minor issues encountered:

  • IPSL.WRF381P.v1: Does not have monthly data, only daily.

  • Variables not found:
    DHMZ.RegCM4-2.v1.psl
    IPSL.WRF381P.v1.orog
    IPSL.WRF381P.v1.sftlf
    RMIB-UGent.ALARO-0.v1.tasmin
    RMIB-UGent.ALARO-0.v1.tasmax
    RMIB-UGent.ALARO-0.v1.psl

@JavierDiezSierra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

JavierDiezSierra commented Dec 16, 2024

I have just started to download cmip5-cordex data to: /mnt/CORDEX_CMIP6_tmp/aux_data/cmip5-cordex

@larsbuntemeyer

@larsbuntemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

larsbuntemeyer commented Jan 12, 2025

@JavierDiezSierra The catalog.csv now holds only the CMIP5 data. Should we make two catalogs for CORDEX-CMIP5 and CORDEX-CMIP6? I see that you translated the attributes to CMIP6, that's good, maybe we should add a mip_era column to the catalog, so we can distinguish CMIP5 and CMIP6 data., then we can have both in one catalog.. Let me check how to handle a master catalog...

@JavierDiezSierra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@larsbuntemeyer Yes, I find both alternatives acceptable, a master catalog or two individual catalogs. Let me know if you need any help.

@jesusff jesusff changed the title available simulations for CMIP5-CORDEX available simulations for CORDEX-CMIP5 Jan 13, 2025
@jesusff
Copy link
Contributor

jesusff commented Jan 13, 2025

yes, the mip_era should be the way to go to distinguish both data streams.

@JavierDiezSierra I renamed on disk the main directory from cmip5-cordex to cordex-cmip5, to keep consistency with CORDEX-CMIP6. At what stage is the old DRS mapped to the CORDEX-CMIP6 one? The data on disk should (and they do now) follow their old, native DRS

@larsbuntemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

larsbuntemeyer commented Jan 13, 2025

Agreed, i'll add a mip_era column!

@JavierDiezSierra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@larsbuntemeyer Many thanks! Let me know once the new catalog is created (or I can create it if you prefer) with both CMIP5 and CMIP6 CORDEX simulations to include the CMIP5 analysis in the eobs.ipynb notebook. Currently, it is not working...

@JavierDiezSierra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@larsbuntemeyer I have just updated the catalog to include both CMIP5 and CMIP6. I plan to commit the changes this morning.

:)

@JavierDiezSierra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Some CMIP5 simulations were removed for several issues:

  • Corrupted files: '/mnt/CORDEX_CMIP6_tmp/aux_data/cordex-cmip5/CORDEX/output/EUR-11/ICTP/ECMWF-ERAINT/evaluation/r1i1p1/RegCM4-6/v1/mon/tas/v20190502'

  • Error when combining by coords with xarray: '/mnt/CORDEX_CMIP6_tmp/aux_data/cordex-cmip5/CORDEX/output/EUR-11/DMI/ECMWF-ERAINT/evaluation/r1i1p1/HIRHAM5/v1/mon/tas'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants