Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Give the possibility of manual freedom in intensity extraction without automation #22

Open
feranick opened this issue Oct 4, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Give the possibility of manual freedom in intensity extraction without automation #22

feranick opened this issue Oct 4, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
3.0

Comments

@feranick
Copy link
Owner

feranick commented Oct 4, 2014

The idea is to to just extract the intensity without caring to much about automation. One could combine the Kalman filter with some manual intervention. The idea would simply be to let the user correct the predicted positions from time to time. The user input could then be incorporated into updating the state model in the same way that the guesses from the fitted positions currently are.

From private communication with Andi.
@feranick feranick added this to the 2.0 milestone Oct 4, 2014
@feranick
Copy link
Owner Author

feranick commented Oct 9, 2014

Consider also the possibility to add a "Pause" in the acquisition to allow for readjustments in spot positions.

@feranick feranick modified the milestones: 3.0, 2.0 Oct 10, 2014
@andim andim mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2017
Closed
@andim
Copy link

andim commented Mar 22, 2017

This issue was moved to andim#4

feranick pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2022
@andim
Merge pull request #22 from andim/fallback-ini
c2a4f0a 
Backup copy of INI and create a new one, when the ini is incompatible…
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@feranick @andim