You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It’s kind of gross to see matrix definitions that include new Q.ComplexNumber( blah, blah ) rather than something simple like '-i'. Something like this within the Matrix constructor might be nice:
@marwahaha I’m confused: Are you suggesting something that differs from the way Q.ComplexNumber has worked from the beginning? (To create a complex number, call new Q.ComplexNumber( real, imaginary ).) I’m suggesting in addition to this existing functionality it would be nice to be able to pass a more human-readable String as an argument that would then be parsed into its correct components. And then Q.Matrix could take advantage of that as well: #38
It’s kind of gross to see matrix definitions that include
new Q.ComplexNumber( blah, blah )
rather than something simple like'-i'
. Something like this within theMatrix
constructor might be nice:But that means having to write
Q.ComplexNumber.fromString( n )
...So this issue is a note-to-self to write that!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: