Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
The issue was that an if else ladder inside a loop was incorrectly refactored to a switch case: This was the original thing ```c++ for (int i = ....) { SELECT_CASE_var = XXXX if (SELECT_CASE_var == blabla) { break; // THIS BREAKS THE FOR LOOP } else ... } ``` The refactor: ```c++ for (int i = ....) { switch (XXX) { case blabla: break; // THIS DO NOT BREAK THE FOR LOOP, it just prevents other `case`s to be processed (fallthrough) } ... } ``` 255e7e939fc?w=1#diff-79e778e07bedf79acf027aa76c1235badd89a6f3014b6f0cdadc4ada74402ae3R3817-R3827
- Loading branch information
78f9058
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
10899_OutputTableMonthly_DuringHours (jmarrec) - x86_64-Linux-Ubuntu-24.04-gcc-13.3: OK (2921 of 2921 tests passed, 0 test warnings)
78f9058
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
10899_OutputTableMonthly_DuringHours (jmarrec) - x86_64-Linux-Ubuntu-24.04-gcc-13.3-UnitTestsCoverage-RelWithDebInfo: OK (2103 of 2103 tests passed, 0 test warnings)
78f9058
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
10899_OutputTableMonthly_DuringHours (jmarrec) - x86_64-Linux-Ubuntu-24.04-gcc-13.3-IntegrationCoverage-RelWithDebInfo: OK (801 of 801 tests passed, 0 test warnings)