Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specific nodes for FMCW-Lidar desirable #42

Open
TimoHinsemann opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Specific nodes for FMCW-Lidar desirable #42

TimoHinsemann opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@TimoHinsemann
Copy link
Collaborator

Either a complete new PerCollECT-Tree only for effects in FMCW-Lidar-Systems or including of FMCW-corresponding nodes (possibly highlighted) in the existing LidarLimbs-Tree.

@TimoHinsemann TimoHinsemann self-assigned this Dec 14, 2023
@TimoHinsemann
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TimoHinsemann commented Aug 21, 2024

Branch "42-specific-nodes-for-fmcw-lidar-desirable" being designed to serve this issue (designed by third party company and later corrected). Four topics to still solve in that branch:

  • Missing "Tag"-Field within node description
  • Nodes "Speckles" and "Scan Speed" pointing on "Incoupling efficiency" may be wrong, no obvious direct dependence. Therefore no literature-references added.
  • Node "speckle-induced noise" has no parent, as there is no node for phase-related errors. It needs to be discussed, if the node "Time domain signal" is covering this.
  • Nodes "Laser coherence", "Laser noise" and "Laser quality" need to be checked, as coherence would lead to noise and, thus, mutual dependencies could be formulated. Therefore no literature-references added.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

1 participant