You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Either a complete new PerCollECT-Tree only for effects in FMCW-Lidar-Systems or including of FMCW-corresponding nodes (possibly highlighted) in the existing LidarLimbs-Tree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Branch "42-specific-nodes-for-fmcw-lidar-desirable" being designed to serve this issue (designed by third party company and later corrected). Four topics to still solve in that branch:
Missing "Tag"-Field within node description
Nodes "Speckles" and "Scan Speed" pointing on "Incoupling efficiency" may be wrong, no obvious direct dependence. Therefore no literature-references added.
Node "speckle-induced noise" has no parent, as there is no node for phase-related errors. It needs to be discussed, if the node "Time domain signal" is covering this.
Nodes "Laser coherence", "Laser noise" and "Laser quality" need to be checked, as coherence would lead to noise and, thus, mutual dependencies could be formulated. Therefore no literature-references added.
Either a complete new PerCollECT-Tree only for effects in FMCW-Lidar-Systems or including of FMCW-corresponding nodes (possibly highlighted) in the existing LidarLimbs-Tree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: