Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Opendap and WMS are applying enhancements correctly #441

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024

Conversation

tdrwenski
Copy link
Contributor

@tdrwenski tdrwenski commented Jan 9, 2024

Ensure both the case of variable enhancement attributes (such as add_offset) in a file and in NcML are tested for NCSS, Opendap, and WMS:

  • NCSS: both cases already present in TestEnhancements
  • Opendap: add both cases to TestEnhancements in this PR. Also added NcML enhance=none case.
  • WMS: enhancement from file already tested in TestWmsServer, NcML enhancement test added in this PR

For the situation tested, NCSS and WMS apply enhancements for both inherent attributes and NcML. Opendap applies the enhancements for NcML when enhance=all is specified but not if enhance=none is specified. Opendap does not apply inherent enhancements to data (so it provides packed binary data).


This change is Reviewable

@tdrwenski tdrwenski changed the title Use enhancements when opening thru opendap and add tests Apply enhancements when opening thru opendap and add tests Jan 9, 2024
@tdrwenski tdrwenski force-pushed the ncml-enhancements branch 3 times, most recently from 3cd53e8 to d359b4c Compare January 10, 2024 20:08
@tdrwenski tdrwenski changed the title Apply enhancements when opening thru opendap and add tests Test Opendap and WMS are applying enhancements correctly Jan 11, 2024
@tdrwenski tdrwenski marked this pull request as ready for review January 11, 2024 17:52
@haileyajohnson haileyajohnson merged commit 7d859e4 into Unidata:main Jan 11, 2024
9 checks passed
@tdrwenski tdrwenski deleted the ncml-enhancements branch January 11, 2024 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants