Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the polling rate configurable for job status #27

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2015
Merged

Conversation

markan
Copy link
Contributor

@markan markan commented Apr 17, 2015

The 0.1 second polling rate is overly intrusive for some users, and can
exacerbate problems on an already loaded server. This sets the default
rate to 1 second and makes it configurable.

@jkeiser If you have a chance, would you take a look at this?

The 0.1 second polling rate is overly intrusive for some users, and can
exacerbate problems on an already loaded server. This sets the default
rate to 1 second and makes it configurable.
@markan
Copy link
Contributor Author

markan commented Apr 17, 2015

Addresses part of the issue mentioned #25

@scalp42
Copy link

scalp42 commented Jun 16, 2015

Any chance to see this merged @manderson26 @jtimberman please ?

@jtimberman
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM 👍

markan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2015
Make the polling rate configurable for job status
@markan markan merged commit 5256a6d into master Jun 17, 2015
@scalp42
Copy link

scalp42 commented Jun 17, 2015

On side note, related to cookbooks, how does someone outside Chef can become reviewer @jtimberman (not talking about opening PRs, but reviewing/testing/merging etc) ?

I believe it's possible since the move to community-maintained cookbooks, but disregard if I've been dreaming 🍶

I'd like to help out 👓

@jtimberman jtimberman deleted the ma/poll_less branch June 17, 2015 22:54
@jtimberman
Copy link
Contributor

@scalp42 if you'd like to be involved, check out this RFC: https://github.com/chef/chef-rfc/blob/master/rfc030-maintenance-policy.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants