Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: introducing lgpl + vulnerable express #13

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

Mark-J-Lawrence
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ❌ 1 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 1 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

package-lock.json

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
extjs-gpl6.2.0GPL-3.0Incompatible License

package.json

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
extjs-gpl^6.2.0NullUnknown License
Denied Licenses: GPL-1.0-or-later, LGPL-2.0-or-later, AGPL-1.0-or-later, BSD-3-Clause-No-Nuclear-License, BSD-3-Clause-No-Nuclear-License-2014, BSD-3-Clause-No-Nuclear-Warranty, BSD-3-Clause-Open-MPI, BSD-4-Clause-Shortened, BSD-4-Clause-UC, BUSL-1.1, CPAL-1.0, CDLA-Permissive-1.0, CDLA-Permissive-2.0, CDLA-Sharing-1.0, CC-BY-ND-1.0, CC-BY-ND-2.0, CC-BY-ND-2.5, CC-BY-ND-3.0, CC-BY-ND-3.0-DE, CC-BY-ND-4.0, CC-BY-NC-1.0, CC-BY-NC-2.0, CC-BY-NC-2.5, CC-BY-NC-3.0, CC-BY-NC-3.0-DE, CC-BY-NC-4.0, CC-BY-NC-ND-1.0, CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0, CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5, CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0, CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0-DE, CC-BY-NC-4.0, CC-BY-NC-ND-1.0, CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0, CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5, CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0, CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0-DE, CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0-IGO, CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0, CC-BY-NC-SA-1.0, CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0, CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-FR, CC-BY-NC-SA-2.0-UK, CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5, CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0, CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0-DE, CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0-IGO, CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0, CC-BY-SA-1.0, CC-BY-SA-2.0, CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK, CC-BY-SA-2.1-JP, CC-BY-SA-2.5, CC-BY-SA-3.0, CC-BY-SA-3.0-AT, CC-BY-SA-3.0-DE, CC-BY-SA-4.0, CC-PDDC, ECL-1.0, Elastic-2.0, EUPL-1.0, EUPL-1.1, EUPL-1.2, MS-LPL, MS-RL, MPL-2.0-no-copyleft-exception, NPL-1.0, NPL-1.1, ODC-By-1.0, ODbL-1.0, PDDL-1.0, SCEA, SSPL-1.0, Vim

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
npm/extjs-gpl 6.2.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/express ^4.18.0 🟢 7.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 1026 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 2dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
SAST🟢 9SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
npm/extjs-gpl ^6.2.0 UnknownUnknown

Scanned Files

  • package-lock.json
  • package.json

@Mark-J-Lawrence Mark-J-Lawrence deleted the dodgyDep branch January 16, 2025 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant