Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

status/report: add 2024Q4 clusteradm report #460

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ppaeps
Copy link
Member

@ppaeps ppaeps commented Jan 20, 2025

First draft of a 2024Q4 status report for the clusteradm team.

Not many exciting things to report on last quarter. Mostly upgrades and putting out fires as usual. The long tail of stable/13 machines is very long indeed. The two stable/12 machines are still there, as well as the seven stable/12 jails.

We helped Moin bring Grimoirelab online. I guess there will be a status report from him about that.

A note about the Taiwan mirror being offline and the new mirror at Sonic going online. I thought about mentioning the move of our California mirror from Fremont to Palo Alto, but that wasn't particularly exciting.

The mountain of technical debt is a bit shorter. The FreeBSD Foundation supported two days a month of my time.

Reviews welcome.

Copy link
Member

@lsalvadore lsalvadore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved with just two small nits. Thanks!

@dbaio
Copy link
Member

dbaio commented Jan 20, 2025

Except for the link salvadore pointed out, everything looks good to me. Thanks for writing this report.

@ppaeps
Copy link
Member Author

ppaeps commented Jan 20, 2025

Thanks for the review! I merged @lsalvadore's changes.

Let's give the others a bit of time to review before pushing upstream.

Reviewed by:	dbaio, jrm, lsalvadore, Pau Amma <pauamma@gundo.com>
@ppaeps
Copy link
Member Author

ppaeps commented Jan 23, 2025

Thanks for the reviews. I've corrected the nits spotted by @Jehops. I also updated the Reviewed by: line to credit the reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants