-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(dashboard/pyroscope): integrate pyroscope database and dashboard #3059
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
cpeliciari
commented
Nov 21, 2024
- Added Pyroscope database configuration in Grafana
- Included Pyroscope service in the docker-compose setup
- Created a new dashboard named "go-libp2p Profiling" for visualizing profiling data
- Added Pyroscope database configuration in Grafana - Included Pyroscope service in the docker-compose setup - Created a new dashboard named "go-libp2p Profiling" for visualizing profiling data
Thanks for the PR @cpeliciari. I'll take a look at this some time this week. I just need to think about whether we have the bandwidth to support and maintain this. cc @MarcoPolo |
@cpeliciari this seems useful; echo Sukun's concern about maintenance. How did you generate the json file, and could you add some more info into the readme about Pyroscope? |
This is pretty cool! This seems pretty well separated from the rest of the metrics/dashboards. Is there a reason to want it merged into this repo? I think if we had many users all wanting to reference this exact dashboard that would be a good case. If it's just a nice demo or proof-of-concept, maybe we could put some information on docs.libp2p.io? |
When I came across the dashboard, I thought it was something to help developers visualize what is happening with libp2p. I had some consumption issues with the library when I was running some tests. |
@aschmahmann @sukunrt and I discussed this in the maintainers call last week, we are on board with merging this since it's a good contribution and can be useful. The consensus was that it doesn't seem like too much of a maintenance overhead and merging it here would be more useful that in another repo. In case, there will be too much overhead required to upkeep pyroscope, we'll remove it later. Thanks @cpeliciari @sukunrt let's review and merge? |