Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhance: [2.5] Refine error msg for schema & index checking (#39533) #39565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

congqixia
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-pick from master
pr: #39533

The error message was malformated or missing some meta info, say field name. This PR recitfies some message format and add field name in error message when type param check fails.


The error message was malformated or missing some meta info, say field
name. This PR recitfies some message format and add field name in error
message when type param check fails.

---------

Signed-off-by: Congqi Xia <congqi.xia@zilliz.com>
@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot added area/test sig/testing size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines. labels Jan 24, 2025
@sre-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: congqixia

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot requested review from czs007 and sunby January 24, 2025 02:06
@mergify mergify bot added dco-passed DCO check passed. kind/enhancement Issues or changes related to enhancement labels Jan 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 24, 2025

@congqixia go-sdk check failed, comment rerun go-sdk can trigger the job again.

@congqixia
Copy link
Contributor Author

rerun go-sdk

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 24, 2025

@congqixia E2e jenkins job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.

@congqixia
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-cpu-e2e

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 68.75000% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.95%. Comparing base (6cdabd9) to head (53b3049).
Report is 3 commits behind head on 2.5.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/datacoord/index_service.go 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
internal/proxy/util.go 81.81% 2 Missing ⚠️
internal/proxy/task_index.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.5   #39565      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.97%   80.95%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1404     1404              
  Lines      198032   198032              
==========================================
- Hits       160347   160324      -23     
- Misses      32037    32060      +23     
  Partials     5648     5648              
Components Coverage Δ
Client 78.26% <ø> (ø)
Core 69.48% <ø> (ø)
Go 82.91% <68.75%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
internal/proxy/task_index.go 75.90% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/datacoord/index_service.go 91.64% <50.00%> (ø)
internal/proxy/util.go 88.75% <81.81%> (-0.18%) ⬇️

... and 28 files with indirect coverage changes

@mergify mergify bot added the ci-passed label Jan 24, 2025
@yanliang567
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot merged commit 6f7b2b4 into milvus-io:2.5 Jan 24, 2025
18 of 20 checks passed
@congqixia congqixia deleted the cp25/39533 branch January 24, 2025 06:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved area/test ci-passed dco-passed DCO check passed. kind/enhancement Issues or changes related to enhancement lgtm sig/testing size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants