Change MR1K1 Bend State Mover to 1 Dimension

[nrwslac]

Description

• changed mr1k1 bend 2d state mover implementation to 1d in PRG_MR1K1_BEND
• I left 2d implementation commented so it can be re-implementated when the motor gets replaced.

Motivation and Context

• MR1K1 Xdwn stream motor had a catastrophic failure and needs replacement; currently unlpugged along with Xup.

How Has This Been Tested?

• deployed and tested state mover motions from OUT to B4C and back OUT.

Where Has This Been Documented?

https://jira.slac.stanford.edu/browse/ECS-6792

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Pre-merge checklist

• Code works interactively
• Code contains descriptive comments
• Test suite passes locally
• Libraries are set to fixed versions and not Always Newest
• Code committed with pre-commit (alternatively pre-commit run --all-files)

[NSLentz]

I believe the state positioner has been changed to 1D correctly.
I was wondering, does the PMPS database need to be updated for this at all? Or was the PMPs only every based on the Y position? If so, I don't think we should even have the X motion be apart of a PMPS state mover. We should actually put the X motion on a 1D motion state mover and keep the Y axis on a 1D PMPS motion state mover.

[nrwslac]

I believe the state positioner has been changed to 1D correctly. I was wondering, does the PMPS database need to be updated for this at all? Or was the PMPs only every based on the Y position? If so, I don't think we should even have the X motion be apart of a PMPS state mover. We should actually put the X motion on a 1D motion state mover and keep the Y axis on a 1D PMPS motion state mover.

This worth thinking about, but X axis determines coating selection which requires PMPS. However, they rarely if ever move to the second coating as we found out.