Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
try to match at least 2 components of base scope with the map #2361
try to match at least 2 components of base scope with the map #2361
Changes from 6 commits
8f9611e
4b1ebc0
8c8e771
0181f82
f49c935
6146450
d10b93f
e15943a
6a5f999
61eb674
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having all those tests might be missing the point a bit. If we want to test that the function does proper matching then we should only need to test "unique" inputs from the point of the function. And should then likely mock the map so that it's clear from the test point of view what are all the inputs.
Unless we are testing the mappings and not the function itself which looks more like what we are doing here. But that doesn't do much for unittesting the code itself and it won't really help to catch the cases we don't account for now.
In any case, we can keep it but we can rewrite those with a lot less duplicated code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just wrote the test to test the mapping to guarantee that we don't miss some things.
But a agree that we can remove it, before we merge.