Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Internal] Micro-optimisation: Reuse previously calculated java.langSystem.nanoTime #1407

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

guizmaii
Copy link
Member

Hey :)

I'm not contributing much anymore. Sorry about that. I lost the motivation, TBH, but I really enjoy following what you continue to do 👏

I was passing by and was reading some of the new code when I saw this. LMKWYT :)

With this change, we lose some nanoseconds of precision, so it might not be the expected behaviour. 🤔

Copy link
Collaborator

@svroonland svroonland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey Jules, good to hear from you again. I understand, motivation fluctuates and interests shift over time, it's familiar to me (in a bit of a contributing spree right now). Feel free to chip in any time in the future of course!

The change looks good to me

@svroonland svroonland merged commit b861c99 into master Nov 26, 2024
10 checks passed
@svroonland svroonland deleted the jules/optimise_commit_0 branch November 26, 2024 08:27
@svroonland
Copy link
Collaborator

It looks like the whole createdAt field in Commit is never used, actually

@erikvanoosten
Copy link
Collaborator

It looks like the whole createdAt field in Commit is never used, actually

Not even for metrics?

@erikvanoosten
Copy link
Collaborator

Isn't this PR colliding with #1375?

@svroonland
Copy link
Collaborator

Nope, no references to the field.

I integrated it into 1375 already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants